Quick Answer: Source attribution identifies the single first-touch or last-touch channel that gets credit for creating a lead or opportunity, while influence attribution measures the set of marketing and sales touchpoints that contributed to moving that account through the pipeline. In pipeline reporting, source attribution is best for origin tracking and channel ROI at the point of entry; influence attribution is better for understanding multi-touch impact across the full buyer journey and for allocating credit across campaigns that assisted conversion.
The core difference is granularity and intent: source attribution answers "where did this opportunity come from?" by assigning credit to one originating source, whereas influence attribution answers "what influenced this opportunity?" by distributing or associating credit across multiple interactions such as ads, website visits, email engagement, events, SDR outreach, and content consumption. For pipeline reporting, source attribution is typically cleaner for operational reporting and attribution governance because it is deterministic and easy to audit, but it underrepresents the complexity of modern B2B buying. Influence attribution provides a more complete view of marketing’s contribution to revenue, especially in long-cycle sales motions with multiple stakeholders and repeated touchpoints, but it requires stronger data hygiene, consistent identity resolution, and a defined model for weighting interactions.