Quick Answer: Measure CAC by attributing every acquisition channel, including partner referrals and co-marketing, with the same fully loaded cost model: sales labor, marketing spend, partner fees, enablement, software, and any co-funded campaign expense. Then calculate CAC separately by channel and use a blended CAC only as a roll-up, so you can see whether partner-led customers are truly efficient after referral incentives, joint event costs, and downstream sales effort are included.
In businesses where partner referrals and co-marketing materially drive pipeline, CAC should not be treated as a single blended marketing metric; it should be modeled as a channel-specific acquisition economics framework. Start by defining the acquisition event you are measuring—typically closed-won customer—and allocate all incremental costs required to generate that customer across the full journey, including partner management, referral commissions, co-branded campaign spend, content creation, SDR/AE labor, attribution tooling, and campaign ops. For partner channels, also capture indirect costs such as alliance team compensation, MDF, event sponsorships, and any shared delivery or onboarding burden that exists to convert referred opportunities. The most reliable method is to calculate both gross CAC by channel and payback period or CAC:LTV by channel, then compare partner-sourced, co-marketed, and direct acquisitions on the same basis using a consistent attribution window and revenue recognition rule.